Total
6763 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-20289 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, low-privileged, local attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of arguments for a specific CLI command. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by including crafted input as the argument of the affected command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system with the privileges of the currently logged-in user. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20277 | 1 Cisco | 1 Thousandeyes Enterprise Agent | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ThousandEyes Enterprise Agent, Virtual Appliance installation type, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform a command injection and elevate privileges to root. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input for the web interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP packet to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands and elevate privileges to root. | |||||
| CVE-2024-20275 | 1 Cisco | 1 Secure Firewall Management Center | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability in the cluster backup feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) Software, formerly Firepower Management Center Software, could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user data that is supplied through the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need valid credentials for a user account with at least the role of Network Administrator. In addition, the attacker would need to persuade a legitimate user to initiate a cluster backup on the affected device. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1881 | 1 Agpt | 1 Autogpt Classic | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| AutoGPT, a component of significant-gravitas/autogpt, is vulnerable to an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS Command Injection') due to a flaw in its shell command validation function. Specifically, the vulnerability exists in versions v0.5.0 up to but not including 5.1.0. The issue arises from the application's method of validating shell commands against an allowlist or denylist, where it only checks the first word of the command. This allows an attacker to bypass the intended restrictions by crafting commands that are executed despite not being on the allowlist or by including malicious commands not present in the denylist. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary shell commands. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1880 | 1 Agpt | 1 Autogpt Classic | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the MacOS Text-To-Speech class MacOSTTS of the significant-gravitas/autogpt project, affecting versions up to v0.5.0. The vulnerability arises from the improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command within the `_speech` method of the MacOSTTS class. Specifically, the use of `os.system` to execute the `say` command with user-supplied text allows for arbitrary code execution if an attacker can inject shell commands. This issue is triggered when the AutoGPT instance is run with the `--speak` option enabled and configured with `TEXT_TO_SPEECH_PROVIDER=macos`, reflecting back a shell injection snippet. The impact of this vulnerability is the potential execution of arbitrary code on the instance running AutoGPT. The issue was addressed in version 5.1.0. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1683 | 1 Tenable | 1 Identity Exposure | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| A DLL injection vulnerability exists where an authenticated, low-privileged local attacker could modify application files on the TIE Secure Relay host, which could allow for overriding of the configuration and running of new Secure Relay services. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1655 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| Certain ASUS WiFi routers models has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary system commands by sending a specially crafted request. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1628 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH | ||
| OS command injection vulnerabilities in GE HealthCare ultrasound devices | |||||
| CVE-2024-1624 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.4 CRITICAL | ||
| An OS Command Injection vulnerability affecting documentation server on 3DEXPERIENCE from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2022x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2024x, SIMULIA Abaqus from Release 2022 through Release 2024, SIMULIA Isight from Release 2022 through Release 2024 and CATIA Composer from Release R2023 through Release R2024. A specially crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary command execution. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1520 | 1 Lollms | 1 Lollms Web Ui | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| An OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in the '/open_code_folder' endpoint of the parisneo/lollms-webui application, due to improper validation of user-supplied input in the 'discussion_id' parameter. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious OS commands, leading to unauthorized command execution on the underlying operating system. This could result in unauthorized access, data leakage, or complete system compromise. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1367 | 1 Tenable | 1 Security Center | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| A command injection vulnerability exists where an authenticated, remote attacker with administrator privileges on the Security Center application could modify Logging parameters, which could lead to the execution of arbitrary code on the Security Center host. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1297 | 1 Loomio | 1 Loomio | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| Loomio version 2.22.0 allows executing arbitrary commands on the server. This is possible because the application is vulnerable to OS Command Injection. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1180 | 1 Tp-link | 2 Omada Er605, Omada Er605 Firmware | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.0 HIGH |
| TP-Link Omada ER605 Access Control Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of TP-Link Omada ER605. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific issue exists within the handling of the name field in the access control user interface. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of a user-supplied string before using it to execute a system call. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-22227. | |||||
| CVE-2024-1115 | 1 Openbi | 1 Openbi | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| A vulnerability was found in openBI up to 1.0.8 and classified as critical. This issue affects the function dlfile of the file /application/websocket/controller/Setting.php. The manipulation of the argument phpPath leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-252473 was assigned to this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-14026 | 1 Qnap | 2 Qts, Quts Hero | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If an attacker gains local network access who have also gained a user account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.1.9.2954 build 20241120 and later QTS 5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later QuTS hero h5.1.9.2954 build 20241120 and later QuTS hero h5.2.3.3006 build 20250108 and later | |||||
| CVE-2024-14010 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Typora 1.7.4 contains a command injection vulnerability in the PDF export preferences that allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands. Attackers can inject malicious commands into the 'run command' input field during PDF export to achieve remote code execution. | |||||
| CVE-2024-14008 | 1 Nagios | 1 Nagios Xi | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.3.2 contain a remote command execution vulnerability in the WinRM Configuration Wizard. Insufficient validation of user-supplied input allows an authenticated administrator to inject shell metacharacters that are incorporated into backend command invocations. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the Nagios XI web application user. | |||||
| CVE-2024-14005 | 1 Nagios | 1 Nagios Xi | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.2 contain a command injection vulnerability in the Docker Wizard. Insufficient validation of user-supplied input in the wizard allows an authenticated administrator to inject shell metacharacters that are incorporated into backend command invocations. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the Nagios XI web application user. | |||||
| CVE-2024-14003 | 1 Nagios | 1 Nagios Xi | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Nagios XI versions prior to 2024R1.2 are vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) through its NRDP (Nagios Remote Data Processor) server plugins. Insufficient validation of inbound NRDP request parameters allows crafted input to reach command execution paths, enabling attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying host in the context of the web/Nagios service. | |||||
| CVE-2024-13985 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A command injection vulnerability in Dahua EIMS versions prior to 2240008 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the capture_handle.action interface. The flaw stems from improper input validation in the captureCommand parameter, which is processed without sanitization or authentication. By sending crafted HTTP requests, attackers can inject OS-level commands that are executed on the server, leading to full system compromise. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-04-06 UTC. | |||||