Total
182 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-36410 | 1 Ibm | 1 Applinx | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.1 LOW |
| IBM ApplinX 11.1 could allow an authenticated user to perform unauthorized administrative actions on the server due to server-side enforcement of client-side security. | |||||
| CVE-2025-36039 | 1 Ibm | 1 Aspera Faspex | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.12.1 could allow an authenticated user to perform unauthorized actions due to client-side enforcement of sever side security mechanisms, | |||||
| CVE-2025-33137 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Aspera Faspex, Linux Kernel | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| IBM Aspera Faspex 5.0.0 through 5.0.12 could allow an authenticated user to obtain sensitive information or perform unauthorized actions on behalf of another user due to client-side enforcement of server-side security. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33025 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5). The 'traceroute' tool in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2025-33024 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5). The 'tcpdump' tool in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32808 | 1 Wwnorton | 1 Inquizitive | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH |
| W. W. Norton InQuizitive through 2025-04-08 allows students to insert arbitrary records of their quiz performance into the backend, because only client-side access control exists. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32469 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.9 CRITICAL | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.5), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.5). The 'ping' tool in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | |||||
| CVE-2025-32359 | 1 Zammad | 1 Zammad | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.8 MEDIUM |
| In Zammad 6.4.x before 6.4.2, there is client-side enforcement of server-side security. When changing their two factor authentication configuration, users need to re-authenticate with their current password first. However, this change was enforced in Zammad only on the front end level, and not when using the API directly. | |||||
| CVE-2025-28168 | 1 Multiple File Upload Project | 1 Multiple File Upload | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| The Multiple File Upload add-on component 3.1.0 for OutSystems is vulnerable to Unrestricted File Upload. This occurs because file extension and size validations are enforced solely on the client side. An attacker can intercept the upload request and modify a parameter to bypass extension restrictions and upload arbitrary files. NOTE: this is a third-party component that is not supplied or supported by OutSystems. | |||||
| CVE-2025-27681 | 1 Printerlogic | 2 Vasion Print, Virtual Appliance | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Vasion Print (formerly PrinterLogic) before Virtual Appliance Host 1.0.735 Application 20.0.1330 mishandles Client Inter-process Security V-2022-004. | |||||
| CVE-2025-27367 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 3 Openpages With Watson, Linux Kernel, Windows | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| IBM OpenPages with Watson 8.3 and 9.0 is vulnerable to improper input validation due to bypassing of client-side validation for the data types and requiredness of fields for GRC Objects when an authenticated user sends a specially crafted payload to the server allowing for data to be saved without storing the required fields. | |||||
| CVE-2025-25497 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
| An issue in account management interface in Netsweeper Server v.8.2.6 and earlier (fixed in v.8.2.7) allows unauthorized changes to the "Account Owner" field due to client-side-only restrictions and a lack of server-side validation. This vulnerability enables account ownership reassignment to or away from any user. | |||||
| CVE-2025-20113 | 1 Cisco | 2 Unified Contact Center Express, Unified Intelligence Center | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Intelligence Center could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to elevate privileges to Administrator for a limited set of functions on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient server-side validation of user-supplied parameters in API or HTTP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a crafted API or HTTP request to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access, modify, or delete data beyond the sphere of their intended access level, including obtaining potentially sensitive information stored in the system. | |||||
| CVE-2025-1838 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cloud Pak For Business Automation | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 24.0.0 and 24.0.1 through 24.0.1 IF001 Authoring allows an authenticated user to bypass client-side data validation in an authoring user interface which could cause a denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2024-9844 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Connect Secure | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH |
| Insufficient server-side controls in Secure Application Manager of Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.4 allows a remote authenticated attacker to bypass restrictions. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6831 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Seth Fogie, member of AXIS Camera Station Pro Bug Bounty Program has found that it is possible to edit and/or remove views without the necessary permission due to a client-side-only check. Axis has released patched versions for the highlighted flaw. Please refer to the Axis security advisory for more information and solution. | |||||
| CVE-2024-6620 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.5 LOW | ||
| Honeywell PC42t, PC42tp, and PC42d Printers, T10.19.020016 to T10.20.060398, contain a cross-site scripting vulnerability. A(n) attacker could potentially inject malicious code which may lead to information disclosure, session theft, or client-side request forgery. Honeywell recommends updating to the most recent version of this firmware, PC42 Printer Firmware Version 20.6 T10.20.060398. | |||||
| CVE-2024-52960 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortisandbox | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| A client-side enforcement of server-side security vulnerability [CWE-602] in Fortinet FortiSandbox version 5.0.0, 4.4.0 through 4.4.6 and before 4.2.7 allows an authenticated attacker with at least read-only permission to execute unauthorized commands via crafted requests. | |||||
| CVE-2024-52008 | 1 Ethyca | 1 Fides | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. The user invite acceptance API endpoint lacks server-side password policy enforcement, allowing users to set arbitrarily weak passwords by bypassing client-side validation. While the UI enforces password complexity requirements, direct API calls can circumvent these checks, enabling the creation of accounts with passwords as short as a single character. When an email messaging provider is enabled and a new user account is created in the system, an invite email containing a special link is sent to the new user's email address. This link directs the new user to a page where they can set their initial password. While the user interface implements password complexity checks, these validations are only performed client-side. The underlying `/api/v1/user/accept-invite` API endpoint does not implement the same password policy validations. This vulnerability allows an invited user to set an extremely weak password for their own account during the initial account setup process. Therefore that specific user's account can be compromised easily by an attacker guessing or brute forcing the password. The vulnerability has been patched in Fides version `2.50.0`. Users are advised to upgrade to this version or later to secure their systems against this threat. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | |||||
| CVE-2024-49824 | 1 Ibm | 2 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.18 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.18 and IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 21.0.0 through 21.0.7.18 and 23.0.0 through 23.0.18 could allow an authenticated user to perform unauthorized actions as a privileged user due to improper validation of client-side security enforcement. | |||||