Total
3621 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-31219 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| The _load_model() function in the neural_magic_training.py script of the optimate project in commit a6d302f912b481c94370811af6b11402f51d377f (2024-07-21) is vulnerable to insecure deserialization (CWE-502). When a user provides a single model file path (e.g., .pt or .pth) via the --model command-line argument, the function loads the file using torch.load() without enabling the weights_only=True security parameter. This allows the deserialization of arbitrary Python objects through the Pickle module. A remote attacker can exploit this by providing a maliciously crafted model file, leading to arbitrary code execution during deserialization on the victim's system. | |||||
| CVE-2026-31218 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| The _load_model() function in the neural_magic_training.py script of the optimate project in commit a6d302f912b481c94370811af6b11402f51d377f (2024-07-21) is vulnerable to insecure deserialization (CWE-502). When loading a model state dictionary from a state_dict.pt file via torch.load(), the function does not enable the weights_only=True security parameter. This allows the deserialization of arbitrary Python objects through the Pickle module. A remote attacker can exploit this by providing a maliciously crafted state_dict.pt file within a directory specified via the --model argument, leading to arbitrary code execution during the deserialization process on the victim's system. | |||||
| CVE-2026-31214 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| The torch-checkpoint-shrink.py script in the ml-engineering project in commit 0099885db36a8f06556efe1faf552518852cb1e0 (2025-20-27) contains an insecure deserialization vulnerability (CWE-502). The script uses torch.load() to process PyTorch checkpoint files (.pt) without enabling the security-restrictive weights_only=True parameter. This oversight allows the deserialization of arbitrary Python objects via the pickle module. A remote attacker can exploit this by providing a maliciously crafted checkpoint file, leading to arbitrary code execution in the context of the user running the script. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2970 | 1 Datapizza | 1 Datapizza Ai | 2026-06-17 | 4.0 MEDIUM | 4.6 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been found in datapizza-labs datapizza-ai 0.0.2. Affected by this vulnerability is the function RedisCache of the file datapizza-ai-cache/redis/datapizza/cache/redis/cache.py. Such manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack requires being on the local network. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2898 | 1 Funadmin | 1 Funadmin | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 MEDIUM | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability was detected in funadmin up to 7.1.0-rc4. This issue affects the function getMember of the file app/common/service/AuthCloudService.php of the component Backend Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument cloud_account results in deserialization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2626 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
| The divi-booster WordPress plugin before 5.0.2 does not have authorization and CSRF checks in one of its fixing function, allowing unauthenticated users to modify stored divi-booster WordPress plugin before 5.0.2 options. Furthermore, due to the use of unserialize() on the data, this could be further exploited when combined with a PHP gadget chain to achieve PHP Object Injection | |||||
| CVE-2026-2599 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| The Database for Contact Form 7, WPforms, Elementor forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.7 via deserialization of untrusted input in the 'download_csv' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software, which means this vulnerability has no impact unless another plugin or theme containing a POP chain is installed on the site. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it may allow the attacker to perform actions like delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code depending on the POP chain present. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2555 | 1 Jeecg | 1 Jeecg Boot | 2026-06-17 | 4.6 MEDIUM | 5.0 MEDIUM |
| A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot 3.9.1. This vulnerability affects the function importDocumentFromZip of the file org/jeecg/modules/airag/llm/controller/AiragKnowledgeController.java of the component Retrieval-Augmented Generation. Executing a manipulation can lead to deserialization. The attack can be launched remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is stated that the exploitability is difficult. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2471 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| The WP Mail Logging plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 1.15.0 via deserialization of untrusted input from the email log message field. This is due to the `BaseModel` class constructor calling `maybe_unserialize()` on all properties retrieved from the database without validation. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP Object by submitting a double-serialized payload through any public-facing form that sends email (e.g., Contact Form 7). When the email is logged and subsequently viewed by an administrator, the malicious payload is deserialized into an arbitrary PHP object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software, which means this vulnerability has no impact unless another plugin or theme containing a POP chain is installed on the site. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it may allow the attacker to perform actions like delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code depending on the POP chain present. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2113 | 1 Tpadmin Project | 1 Tpadmin | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 HIGH | 7.3 HIGH |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in yuan1994 tpadmin up to 1.3.12. This affects an unknown part in the library /public/static/admin/lib/webuploader/0.1.5/server/preview.php of the component WebUploader. The manipulation leads to deserialization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2037 | 1 Gfi | 1 Archiver | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| GFI Archiver MArc.Core Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GFI Archiver. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of the MArc.Core.Remoting.exe process, which listens on port 8017. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-27935. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2036 | 1 Gfi | 1 Archiver | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| GFI Archiver MArc.Store Deserialization of Untrusted Data Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GFI Archiver. Although authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability, the existing authentication mechanism can be bypassed. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of the MArc.Store.Remoting.exe process. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in deserialization of untrusted data. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of SYSTEM. Was ZDI-CAN-27936. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2020 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH | ||
| The JS Archive List plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 6.1.7 via the 'included' shortcode attribute. This is due to the deserialization of untrusted input supplied via the 'included' parameter of the plugin's shortcode. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it could allow the attacker to delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code. | |||||
| CVE-2026-29109 | 1 Suitecrm | 1 Suitecrm | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH |
| SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. Versions up to and including 8.9.2 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the SavedSearch filter processing component that allows an authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary system commands on the server. `FilterDefinitionProvider.php` calls `unserialize()` on user-controlled data from the `saved_search.contents` database column without restricting instantiable classes. Version 8.9.3 patches the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2026-28277 | 1 Langchain | 1 Langgraph | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.8 MEDIUM |
| LangGraph SQLite Checkpoint is an implementation of LangGraph CheckpointSaver that uses SQLite DB (both sync and async, via aiosqlite). In version 1.0.9 and prior, LangGraph checkpointers can load msgpack-encoded checkpoints that reconstruct Python objects during deserialization. If an attacker can modify checkpoint data in the backing store (for example, after a database compromise or other privileged write access to the persistence layer), they can potentially supply a crafted payload that triggers unsafe object reconstruction when the checkpoint is loaded. No known patch is public. | |||||
| CVE-2026-28138 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Stylemix uListing ulisting allows Object Injection.This issue affects uListing: from n/a through <= 2.2.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-28105 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in ThemeREX Good Energy goodenergy allows Object Injection.This issue affects Good Energy: from n/a through <= 1.7.7. | |||||
| CVE-2026-28074 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL | ||
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in ThemeREX Pizza House pizzahouse allows Object Injection.This issue affects Pizza House: from n/a through <= 1.4.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-27971 | 1 Qwik | 1 Qwik | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| Qwik is a performance focused javascript framework. qwik <=1.19.0 is vulnerable to RCE due to an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the server$ RPC mechanism that allows any unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the server with a single HTTP request. Affects any deployment where require() is available at runtime. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.19.1. | |||||
| CVE-2026-27794 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.6 MEDIUM | ||
| LangGraph Checkpoint defines the base interface for LangGraph checkpointers. Prior to version 4.0.0, a Remote Code Execution vulnerability exists in LangGraph's caching layer when applications enable cache backends that inherit from `BaseCache` and opt nodes into caching via `CachePolicy`. Prior to `langgraph-checkpoint` 4.0.0, `BaseCache` defaults to `JsonPlusSerializer(pickle_fallback=True)`. When msgpack serialization fails, cached values can be deserialized via `pickle.loads(...)`. Caching is not enabled by default. Applications are affected only when the application explicitly enables a cache backend (for example by passing `cache=...` to `StateGraph.compile(...)` or otherwise configuring a `BaseCache` implementation), one or more nodes opt into caching via `CachePolicy`, and the attacker can write to the cache backend (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth, shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services, or a writable SQLite cache file). An attacker must be able to write attacker-controlled bytes into the cache backend such that the LangGraph process later reads and deserializes them. This typically requires write access to a networked cache (for example a network-accessible Redis instance with weak/no auth or shared cache infrastructure reachable by other tenants/services) or write access to local cache storage (for example a writable SQLite cache file via permissive file permissions or a shared writable volume). Because exploitation requires write access to the cache storage layer, this is a post-compromise / post-access escalation vector. LangGraph Checkpoint 4.0.0 patches the issue. | |||||