Total
136 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1486 | 2026-07-15 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. A vulnerability exists in the jwt-authorization-grant flow where the server fails to verify if an Identity Provider (IdP) is enabled before issuing tokens. The issuer lookup mechanism (lookupIdentityProviderFromIssuer) retrieves the IdP configuration but does not filter for isEnabled=false. If an administrator disables an IdP (e.g., due to a compromise or offboarding), an entity possessing that IdP's signing key can still generate valid JWT assertions that Keycloak accepts, resulting in the issuance of valid access tokens. | |||||
| CVE-2026-48797 | 2026-06-18 | N/A | N/A | ||
| Backpropagate is a Python library for fine-tuning large language models on a single GPU. In versions 1.1.0 and 1.1.1, the optional Reflex web UI exposes a training control plane without authentication: dataset upload, model load, training start/stop, multi-run orchestration, GGUF export, and HuggingFace Hub push. The CLI accepts two operator-facing flags intended as security controls: --auth user:pass — documented as "require HTTP Basic authentication on every request to the UI." and--share — documented as "expose the UI on a public address; requires --auth." When --auth user:pass is passed, the CLI prints Auth: enabled (user: <username>) to confirm to the operator that authentication is active, then exports BACKPROPAGATE_UI_AUTH=user:pass to the subprocess that launches the Reflex backend. The Reflex backend (backpropagate/ui_app/**) never reads BACKPROPAGATE_UI_AUTH. No authentication middleware is registered. No request-level guard runs. No WebSocket upgrade guard runs. Any client that reaches the bound port — local or remote, depending on whether --share is used — has full UI access. An inline comment at backpropagate/cli.py:1217-1218 in the v1.1.0 source documents the gap: "For Phase 1 the variable is exported but Reflex doesn't read it yet." This comment was internal-facing; the user-facing documentation (README, CHANGELOG, SHIP_GATE) advertised the contract as enforced. An attacker who reaches the bound port can read uploaded datasets, trigger arbitrary training runs against any local base models as well as read their paths, trigger HuggingFace Hub pushes and cause disk-fill DoS. This issue has been fixed in version 1.2.0. If developers cannot immediately upgrade to 1.2.0 run backprop ui with no flags so it binds to localhost, use SSH port-forwarding (ssh -L 7860:localhost:7860 <training-host>) instead of --share for remote access, and audit any host previously launched with --share, re-issuing any HF tokens used during those sessions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-2645 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| In wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier, a logic flaw existed in the TLS 1.2 server state machine implementation. The server could incorrectly accept the CertificateVerify message before the ClientKeyExchange message had been received. This issue affects wolfSSL before 5.8.4 (wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier is vulnerable, 5.8.4 is not vulnerable). In 5.8.4 wolfSSL would detect the issue later in the handshake. 5.9.0 was further hardened to catch the issue earlier in the handshake. | |||||
| CVE-2026-29103 | 1 Suitecrm | 1 Suitecrm | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. A Critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in SuiteCRM 7.15.0 and 8.9.2, allowing authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary system commands. This vulnerability is a direct Patch Bypass of CVE-2024-49774. Although the vendor attempted to fix the issue in version 7.14.5, the underlying flaw in ModuleScanner.php regarding PHP token parsing remains. The scanner incorrectly resets its internal state ($checkFunction flag) when encountering any single-character token (such as =, ., or ;). This allows attackers to hide dangerous function calls (e.g., system(), exec()) using variable assignments or string concatenation, completely evading the MLP security controls. Versions 7.15.1 and 8.9.3 patch the issue. | |||||
| CVE-2025-8204 | 1 Comodo | 1 Dragon | 2026-06-17 | 2.6 LOW | 3.1 LOW |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Comodo Dragon up to 134.0.6998.179. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component HSTS Handler. The manipulation leads to security check for standard. The attack can be launched remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2025-66607 | 1 Yokogawa | 1 Fast\/tools | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.3 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been found in FAST/TOOLS provided by Yokogawa Electric Corporation. The response header contains an insecure setting. Users could be redirected to malicious sites by an attacker. The affected products and versions are as follows: FAST/TOOLS (Packages: RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB) R9.01 to R10.04 | |||||
| CVE-2025-66603 | 1 Yokogawa | 1 Fast\/tools | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.8 CRITICAL |
| A vulnerability has been found in FAST/TOOLS provided by Yokogawa Electric Corporation. The web server accepts the OPTIONS method. An attacker could potentially use this information to carry out other attacks. The affected products and versions are as follows: FAST/TOOLS (Packages: RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB) R9.01 to R10.04 | |||||
| CVE-2025-66601 | 1 Yokogawa | 1 Fast\/tools | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM |
| A vulnerability has been found in FAST/TOOLS provided by Yokogawa Electric Corporation. This product does not specify MIME types. When an attacker performs a content sniffing attack, malicious scripts could be executed. The affected products and versions are as follows: FAST/TOOLS (Packages: RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB) R9.01 to R10.04 | |||||
| CVE-2025-66600 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | N/A | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in FAST/TOOLS provided by Yokogawa Electric Corporation. This product lacks HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) configuration. When an attacker performs a Man in the middle (MITM) attack, communications with the web server could be sniffed. The affected products and versions are as follows: FAST/TOOLS (Packages: RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB) R9.01 to R10.04 | |||||
| CVE-2025-62002 | 1 Bullwall | 1 Ransomware Containment | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| BullWall Ransomware Containment considers the number of files modified to trigger detection. An authenticated attacker could encrypt a single (possibly large) file without triggering detection if thresholds are configured to require multiple file changes. The number of files to trigger detection can be configured by the user. Versions 4.6.0.0, 4.6.0.6, 4.6.0.7, and 4.6.1.4 are affected. Other versions may also be affected. | |||||
| CVE-2025-49011 | 1 Authzed | 1 Spicedb | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.7 LOW |
| SpiceDB is an open source database for storing and querying fine-grained authorization data. Prior to version 1.44.2, on schemas involving arrows with caveats on the arrow’ed relation, when the path to resolve a CheckPermission request involves the evaluation of multiple caveated branches, requests may return a negative response when a positive response is expected. Version 1.44.2 fixes the issue. As a workaround, do not use caveats in the schema over an arrow’ed relation. | |||||
| CVE-2025-43262 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.1 MEDIUM |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Tahoe 26. USB Restricted Mode may not be applied to accessories connected during boot. | |||||
| CVE-2025-3069 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in Extensions in Google Chrome prior to 135.0.7049.52 allowed a remote attacker to perform privilege escalation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2025-32086 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.2 HIGH | ||
| Improperly implemented security check for standard in the DDRIO configuration for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 Processors when using Intel(R) SGX or Intel(R) TDX may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | |||||
| CVE-2025-21267 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Edge Chromium | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2025-13333 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 could provide weaker than expected security during system administration of security settings. | |||||
| CVE-2024-7965 | 2 Google, Microsoft | 2 Chrome, Edge Chromium | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 128.0.6613.84 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||
| CVE-2024-7003 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in FedCM in Google Chrome prior to 127.0.6533.72 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | |||||
| CVE-2024-6995 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.7 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in Fullscreen in Google Chrome on Android prior to 127.0.6533.72 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to spoof the contents of the Omnibox (URL bar) via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||
| CVE-2024-6772 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 126.0.6478.182 allowed a remote attacker to perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | |||||