Total
9889 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-57626 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in MailPoet allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects MailPoet: from 5.30.0 through 5.33.0. | |||||
| CVE-2026-44925 | 1 Veritas | 1 Infoscale Operations Manager | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in InfoScale v.9.1.3 Operations Manager (VIOM) allows an attacker to force the user with an active session into clicking a malicious HTML link, which triggers unintended modifications on VIOM web application without the user's knowledge. | |||||
| CVE-2026-40864 | 1 Jupyter | 1 Jupyterhub | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| JupyterHub is software that allows users to create a multi-user server for Jupyter notebooks. In versions 4.1.0 through 5.4.4, XSRF protection (updated in 4.1.0) inappropriately treated requests with Sec-Fetch-Mode: no-cors as same-origin requests, bypassing XSRF checks. The JSON API is not affected, only HTTP form endpoints, such as /hub/spawn and /hub/accept-share, meaning attackers could trigger server spawn (but not access the server) and if the attacker is a JupyterHub user permitted to share access to their server, cause a user to accept a share and have access to the attacker's server. This issue has been fixed in version 5.4.5. If developers are unable to immediately upgrade, they can temporarily mitigate this issue by dropping requests to JupyterHub with Sec-Fetch-Mode: no-cors if they are using a reverse proxy. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9236 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The CM Ad Changer – A simple tool to control and optimize your site's banners plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cmac_campaigns_action function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to permanently delete arbitrary advertising campaigns, including their associated banner records and uploaded files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8174 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 5.7 MEDIUM | ||
| Zohocorp Zoho Mail wordpress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF). This issue affects Zoho Mail wordpress plugin versions before 1.6.2. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9303 | 2026-07-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability was identified in calcom cal.diy up to 4.9.4. Impacted is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | |||||
| CVE-2026-9486 | 2026-07-23 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Student Grades Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. | |||||
| CVE-2026-41074 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH | ||
| RT is an open source, enterprise-grade issue and ticket tracking system. Versions 6.0.0 through 6.0.2 contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An attacker who can induce a logged-in RT user to visit a malicious web page can trigger arbitrary state-changing actions in RT on that user's behalf. This issue has been fixed in version 6.0.3. | |||||
| CVE-2024-32110 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Magepeople inc. WpEvently allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WpEvently: from n/a through 4.1.2. | |||||
| CVE-2026-53736 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Easy Twitter Feeds before 1.2.13 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the duplicate_post action handler that lacks nonce verification. Attackers can trick an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link that duplicates any post regardless of post type. | |||||
| CVE-2026-53739 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Yoast Duplicate Post through 4.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the duplicate_post_dismiss_notice handler, which verifies no nonce or capability. Attackers can trick any authenticated user into sending a request that sets the duplicate_post_show_notice site option, suppressing admin notices network-wide. | |||||
| CVE-2026-39170 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.3 MEDIUM | ||
| SemCms 5.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via crafted POST request to /admin/semcms_user.php. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8904 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The FastPicker, an order picker and order management system (oms) for WooCommerce on steroids plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settingsPage function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings, including toggling the webhook integration and changing the FastPicker and KDZ API URLs via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8909 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The WpMobi plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the handleSaveGeneralSettings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's General Settings and inject arbitrary web scripts into the administrator's browser via the unescaped app_name attribute reflection via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. The injected script executes even when the supplied app_name value fails validation and is not persisted to the database, because the form is re-rendered with the attacker-supplied in-memory value on validation failure. | |||||
| CVE-2026-10553 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The jQuery Hover Footnotes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the jqFootnotes_options_subpanel function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings with arbitrary values that, because option values such as jqfoot_anchor_open, jqfoot_anchor_close, and jqfoot_title are echoed unescaped into frontend page content, can be chained into persistent Cross-Site Scripting affecting all site visitors via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Successful exploitation of the CSRF vulnerability can be chained into stored Cross-Site Scripting, as the overwritten option values are persisted via update_option() without sanitization and rendered unescaped on the frontend. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8907 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The WP-Ultimate-Map plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the process_init() function hooked to admin_init, which saves plugin settings (zoom-level, focus-lat, focus-lng, sel_places, sel_routes) via update_option() based solely on the presence of a save-setting POST parameter. Additionally, the saved values — particularly zoom-level — are stored without sanitization and later echoed into an HTML attribute (and inline JavaScript) on the settings page without escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change plugin settings and inject arbitrary web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8940 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The WP Meta Sort Posts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the top-level included script in msp-options.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's msp_loop_file and msp_nav_location settings via a forged request via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8902 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The AJAX Report Comments plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the rc_options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings including link text and markup, success/failure/already-reported messages, comment threshold, cookie duration, reporter-comment toggle, and notification email address, subject, and message body via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-8910 | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.1 MEDIUM | ||
| The WP Emoticon Rating plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-11194 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-07-23 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| Inappropriate implementation in Network in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | |||||