Total
9688 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-61097 | 1 Oracle | 1 Banking Trade Finance Process Management | 2026-08-17 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Banking Trade Finance Process Management product of Oracle Financial Services Applications (component: Common). Supported versions that are affected are 14.6.0-14.8.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Banking Trade Finance Process Management. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Banking Trade Finance Process Management, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Banking Trade Finance Process Management accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Banking Trade Finance Process Management accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle Banking Trade Finance Process Management. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.6 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L). | |||||
| CVE-2026-60962 | 1 Oracle | 1 Flow Manufacturing | 2026-08-17 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Flow Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Flow Manufacturing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Flow Manufacturing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Flow Manufacturing accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Flow Manufacturing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | |||||
| CVE-2026-61217 | 1 Oracle | 1 Security Service | 2026-08-17 | N/A | 6.4 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Security Service product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Oracle SSL API). The supported version that is affected is 12.2.1.4.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via TLS to compromise Oracle Security Service. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Security Service accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Security Service accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). | |||||
| CVE-2026-73481 | 2026-08-14 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| phpList before 3.7.0-RC5 fail to enforce CSRF token validation on the bounce rule deletion endpoint (bouncerules.php / bouncerule.php). The deletion is performed via a GET request (?page=bouncerules&del=N), and the central CSRF check (verifyCsrfGetToken) is invoked with enforce=false, so it only validates the token when a 'tk' parameter is present. A remote attacker can trick an authenticated administrator into loading a crafted URL (e.g., embedded in an image tag) to delete arbitrary bounce rules from the phplist_bounceregex table without a valid CSRF token. | |||||
| CVE-2026-19786 | 2026-08-14 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A vulnerability was found in francoisjacquet RosarioSIS up to 12.8. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file Modules.php. Performing a manipulation results in cross-site request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. Upgrading to version 12.9 is capable of addressing this issue. The patch is named 801a71272c82cf4bf695fdc5ed42a9b7511d124d. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. | |||||
| CVE-2026-70556 | 2026-08-13 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Hubzilla versions prior to 11.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the OAuth2 /authorize endpoint handled by Zotlabs\Module\Authorize::post() that allows unauthenticated attackers to register arbitrary OAuth2 applications under an authenticated user's account by submitting a cross-origin POST request without CSRF token or Origin/Referer validation. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML form that autosubmits attacker-chosen OAuth2 parameters including client_id, client_secret, redirect_uri, and scope to silently register a persistent OAuth2 application, enabling interception of future OAuth2 authorization codes when the victim later authenticates against the attacker-controlled client. | |||||
| CVE-2026-58482 | 1 Network-ai | 1 Network-ai | 2026-08-13 | N/A | 5.9 MEDIUM |
| Network-AI, a TypeScript/Node.js multi-agent orchestrator, has a shipped, exported, documented feature called `ApprovalInbox` (`lib/approval-inbox.ts`). It is the network surface of the human-in-the-loop Approval Gate, which `ApprovalGate` uses to require explicit human approval for high-risk operations. The HTTP server it exposes has no authentication of any kind and sets `Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *` on every route, including the state-changing `POST /approvals/:id/approve` and `/deny`. As a result, in versions 5.0.0 through 5.12.1, any party who can send an HTTP request to the inbox port — a co-located process, a container/SSRF on the same host, a remote client when the operator binds a non-loopback address, or any website the operator visits in a browser (via the wildcard CORS) — can enumerate pending approvals and approve them, defeating the entire human-in-the-loop control and causing the gated high-risk action (e.g. a shell command the agent was holding for review) to execute without consent. This issue is fixed in v5.12.2. `ApprovalInbox` now accepts a `secret` option. When set, the mutating endpoints `POST /:id/approve` and `POST /:id/deny` require an `Authorization: Bearer <secret>` header, validated in constant time with `crypto.timingSafeEqual`. `startServer()` already binds to `127.0.0.1` by default; operators exposing the inbox on a network must set a secret. | |||||
| CVE-2026-60957 | 1 Oracle | 1 E-business Suite | 2026-08-13 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Transportation Execution product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Transportation Execution. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Transportation Execution, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Transportation Execution accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Transportation Execution accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | |||||
| CVE-2025-14469 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| The Theme Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the ms_update AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify child theme CSS styles via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-7444 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | 8.1 HIGH | ||
| The Search Analytics for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.16. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the `process_bulk_action()` function of `MWTSA_Stats_Table`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary search-term records, including all associated search-history rows, via a forged request granted they can trick a user with access to the plugin's "Search Analytics" dashboard page (Administrator by default) into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | |||||
| CVE-2026-15988 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | 8.8 HIGH | ||
| The AI Engine – The Chatbot, AI Framework & MCP for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.5 This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reauth_for_authorize function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new administrator accounts with attacker-supplied credentials via a CSRF-based REST authentication bypass, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This bypass can be combined with WordPress's ?_method=POST method-override support to convert a top-navigation GET request into an authenticated POST to the REST users endpoint, requiring no existing account on the attacker's part. | |||||
| CVE-2026-18819 | 2026-08-12 | 5.0 MEDIUM | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| A security vulnerability has been detected in RackTables up to 0.22.0/e5fff9f8aab339798ed47e8c6d7d977ed97a82bd. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project maintainer confirms: "[I]t seems plausible, in that RackTables does not at this time have any CSRF prevention. You may assign a CVE ID to this, but there is no guarantee it will be handled in urgent, or even timely, manner, or at all." | |||||
| CVE-2026-66681 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Theme My Login <= 7.1.14 versions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-28172 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | 7.1 HIGH | ||
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Tracking Code Manager <= 2.6.0 versions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-66686 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM | ||
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Plugins Garbage Collector (Database Cleanup) <= 0.14 versions. | |||||
| CVE-2026-66642 | 2026-08-12 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WP Umbrella allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects WP Umbrella: from 2.24.2 through 2.26.2. | |||||
| CVE-2025-13394 | 1 Wso2 | 9 Api Control Plane, Api Manager, Enterprise Integrator and 6 more | 2026-08-12 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| The Ajax processor within the Carbon console fails to adequately protect state-changing operations from Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks. Specifically, it utilizes the HTTP GET method for these operations, and while the SameSite=Lax cookie attribute is employed for mitigation, this mechanism is bypassed as it permits cookies to be sent with cross-origin top-level navigation requests, including GET requests. This allows an attacker to trick an authenticated user's browser into unknowingly executing unintended actions. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to perform unauthorized state-altering requests on behalf of authenticated users. This could lead to consequences such as data modification, account changes, or other actions that could result in data compromise or loss of user control over their account. However, this attack is only feasible if the Carbon console and related services are exposed to the public internet, which is not recommended according to WSO2's security guidelines. | |||||
| CVE-2024-0830 | 1 Najeebmedia | 1 Comments Extra Fields For Post\, Pages And Cpt | 2026-08-11 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM |
| The Comments Extra Fields For Post,Pages and CPT plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several ajax actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke those actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. As a result, they may modify comment form fields and update plugin settings. | |||||
| CVE-2026-60911 | 1 Oracle | 1 Property Manager | 2026-08-11 | N/A | 5.4 MEDIUM |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Property Manager product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Internal Operations). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Property Manager. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Property Manager, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Property Manager accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Property Manager accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). | |||||
| CVE-2026-46409 | 2026-08-11 | N/A | 9.6 CRITICAL | ||
| OpenYak is a local-first agent runtime for reliable tool-using models, with a desktop workspace built on top. Prior to version 1.1.3, the OpenYak desktop backend binds an HTTP API to `127.0.0.1:<random port>` (commonly 19141) without server-side Origin validation, loopback authentication, or Content-Type enforcement, and with a wildcard CORS policy. Any webpage a user visits while OpenYak is running can issue cross-origin requests to this local server — the browser acts as a proxy into loopback, bypassing OS-level network isolation. Chained, this lets a malicious page execute arbitrary shell commands on the host (RCE) via the build agent with `permission_presets.bash=true`, shut down the service, and exfiltrate chat history and account PII — with no user interaction beyond opening the page. Version 1.1.3 patches the issue. | |||||
