Total
7908 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v2 | CVSS v3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-24193 | 1 Apple | 2 Ipados, Iphone Os | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 2.4 LOW |
| This issue was addressed with improved authentication. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4. An attacker with a USB-C connection to an unlocked device may be able to programmatically access photos. | |||||
| CVE-2025-24173 | 1 Apple | 5 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| This issue was addressed with additional entitlement checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, iPadOS 17.7.6, macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5, macOS Ventura 13.7.5, tvOS 18.4, visionOS 2.4, watchOS 11.4. An app may be able to break out of its sandbox. | |||||
| CVE-2025-24165 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5, macOS Ventura 13.7.5. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination. | |||||
| CVE-2025-24090 | 1 Apple | 2 Ipados, Iphone Os | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 3.3 LOW |
| A permissions issue was addressed with additional restrictions. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.3 and iPadOS 18.3. An app may be able to enumerate a user's installed apps. | |||||
| CVE-2025-24088 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| The issue was addressed by adding additional logic. This issue is fixed in macOS Tahoe 26. An app may be able to override MDM-enforced settings from profiles. | |||||
| CVE-2025-24076 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 11 22h2, Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2 and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| Improper access control in Windows Cross Device Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | |||||
| CVE-2025-24042 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Visual Studio Code | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| Visual Studio Code JS Debug Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | |||||
| CVE-2025-23389 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 8.4 HIGH | ||
| A Improper Access Control vulnerability in SUSE rancher allows a local user to impersonate other identities through SAML Authentication on first login. This issue affects rancher: from 2.8.0 before 2.8.13, from 2.9.0 before 2.9.7, from 2.10.0 before 2.10.3. | |||||
| CVE-2025-23365 | 1 Siemens | 1 Tia Administrator | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.8 HIGH |
| A vulnerability has been identified in TIA Administrator (All versions < V3.0.6). The affected application allows low-privileged users to trigger installations by overwriting cache files and modifying the downloads path. This would allow an attacker to escalate privilege and exceute arbitrary code. | |||||
| CVE-2025-23329 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Nvidia | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Triton Inference Server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.5 HIGH |
| NVIDIA Triton Inference Server for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause memory corruption by identifying and accessing the shared memory region used by the Python backend. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2025-23277 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH | ||
| NVIDIA Display Driver for Linux and Windows contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode driver, where an attacker could access memory outside bounds permitted under normal use cases. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service, data tampering, or information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2025-23243 | 2 Linux, Nvidia | 2 Linux Kernel, Riva | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.5 MEDIUM |
| NVIDIA Riva contains a vulnerability where a user could cause an improper access control issue. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to data tampering or denial of service. | |||||
| CVE-2025-23242 | 2 Linux, Nvidia | 2 Linux Kernel, Riva | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.3 HIGH |
| NVIDIA Riva contains a vulnerability where a user could cause an improper access control issue. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to escalation of privileges, data tampering, denial of service, or information disclosure. | |||||
| CVE-2025-23203 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 5.5 MEDIUM | ||
| Icinga Director is an Icinga config deployment tool. A Security vulnerability has been found starting in version 1.0.0 and prior to 1.10.4 and 1.11.4 on several director endpoints of REST API. To reproduce this vulnerability an authenticated user with permission to access the Director is required (plus api access with regard to the api endpoints). And even though some of these Icinga Director users are restricted from accessing certain objects, are able to retrieve information related to them if their name is known. This makes it possible to change the configuration of these objects by those Icinga Director users restricted from accessing them. This results in further exploitation, data breaches and sensitive information disclosure. Affected endpoints include icingaweb2/director/service, if the host name is left out of the query; icingaweb2/directore/notification; icingaweb2/director/serviceset; and icingaweb2/director/scheduled-downtime. In addition, the endpoint `icingaweb2/director/services?host=filteredHostName` returns a status code 200 even though the services for the host is filtered. This in turn lets the restricted user know that the host `filteredHostName` exists even though the user is restricted from accessing it. This could again result in further exploitation of this information and data breaches. Icinga Director has patches in versions 1.10.4 and 1.11.4. If upgrading is not feasible, disable the director module for the users other than admin role for the time being. | |||||
| CVE-2025-23164 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.4 MEDIUM | ||
| A misconfigured access token mechanism in the Unifi Protect Application (Version 5.3.41 and earlier) could permit the recipient of a "Share Livestream" link to maintain access to the corresponding livestream subsequent to such link becoming disabled. | |||||
| CVE-2025-23083 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 7.7 HIGH | ||
| With the aid of the diagnostics_channel utility, an event can be hooked into whenever a worker thread is created. This is not limited only to workers but also exposes internal workers, where an instance of them can be fetched, and its constructor can be grabbed and reinstated for malicious usage. This vulnerability affects Permission Model users (--permission) on Node.js v20, v22, and v23. | |||||
| CVE-2025-23048 | 1 Apache | 1 Http Server | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| In some mod_ssl configurations on Apache HTTP Server 2.4.35 through to 2.4.63, an access control bypass by trusted clients is possible using TLS 1.3 session resumption. Configurations are affected when mod_ssl is configured for multiple virtual hosts, with each restricted to a different set of trusted client certificates (for example with a different SSLCACertificateFile/Path setting). In such a case, a client trusted to access one virtual host may be able to access another virtual host, if SSLStrictSNIVHostCheck is not enabled in either virtual host. | |||||
| CVE-2025-22940 | 1 Adtran | 2 411, 411 Firmware | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 9.1 CRITICAL |
| Incorrect access control in Adtran 411 ONT L80.00.0011.M2 allows unauthorized attackers to arbitrarily set the admin password. | |||||
| CVE-2025-22844 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 4.3 MEDIUM | ||
| Improper access control for some Edge Orchestrator software for Intel(R) Tiber™ Edge Platform may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via adjacent access. | |||||
| CVE-2025-22391 | 2026-06-17 | N/A | 6.7 MEDIUM | ||
| Improper access control for some SigTest before version 6.1.10 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | |||||